|
About
this BLOG
It has been an amazing experience to be a part of the growth
of the home entertainment industry over the past 10 years, during
this time, there have been interesting transitions and a tendency
to fix things when nothing was broken. Remember Betamax, lease
disc, revenue sharing, DIVX, D-VHS, EZ-D disposable disc, video-on-demand
will kill all video store, MovieBeam set top box and now electronic
delivery. This Blog is my views and 2 cents about home entertainment
& the technology driving it from, also the latest buzz on
technology & downloads.
Alan Leung - Top Video World
|
News
and Rumors:
(08/12/2008) Morgan
Freeman's ClickStar and Vongo movie download sites going
out of business.
It comes as no surprise, two pioneering Internet movie
download sites have silently switched off their servers.
Vongo, launched in 2006 by Starz Entertainment, posted
a notice Friday it was no longer welcoming new subscribers,
and that existing subscribers would be able to download
movies only through the end of September. Vongo, which
replaced an earlier Starz Internet service called Starz
Ticket, was one of the few sites offering consumers unlimited
downloading of recent movie releases.
Morgan
Freeman's much-hyped ClickStar service ( a joint venture
between his production company Revelations Entertainment
and chip-maker Intel Corp.) open for business in December
2006, went dark (RIP) earlier this year.
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(08/08/2008) Broadband
usage caps is here.
Comcast was caught slowing down BitTorrent traffic last
year by the Associated Press. It sparked cries for government-mandated
net neutrality—treating all internet traffic equally,
whether it's email, watching porn or a bootleg of The
Dark Knight over torrent. While that didn't happen, a
complaint against Comcast went through the FCC, which
ruled against it last week, saying that slowing down BitTorrent
was a naughty thing to do, and that they must disclose
all management practices to subscribers. The end result
though, and what we're already seeing, is that ISPs will
move away from network filters and get into data caps—which
are FCC approved. Or at least, not disapproved.
In
the meantime, a different network management trend started
to emerge among the major ISPs: metered broadband, aka
data caps. It's like dial-up service or wireless data:
After reaching your alotted amount of data for the month,
you pay extra, maybe through the nose, as our northern
neighbors in Canada are familiar with. Conveniently, it's
"net neutral," since it doesn't discriminate against particular
kinds of traffic, and it's fully disclosed to subscribers
so it satisfies guidelines discussed by FCC Chairman Kevin
Martin. In case you're looking to file a complaint, Electronic
Frontier Foundation Senior Staff Attorney Fred Von Lohmann
stated, "There's certainly nothing to stop them from pricing
that way if they want to."
Time
Warner was the first major to float the plan, which is
currently in testing, with a 40GB cap at the high-end.
Comcast is considering a metered approach as well, its
spokesman has confirmed. AT&T is the most recent major
ISP to jump onboard, and it'll be testing caps in the
fall. Not to mention Cox Cable and a whole mess of regional
ISPs already implement them.
Here's
the rub: The P2P apps ISPs point to as pillaging their
networks are increasingly a nonexistant bogeyman. Video
is now the actual bandwidth monster, and it's only getting
hungrier and hungrier. The thing about all that video
is that it competes with what your ISP is probably delivering
to your other screen in the living room. Why watch Howard
Stern on your couch at specific time when you can grab
it on demand on your laptop with Hulu, or on a Netflix
Roku box? That awesome Vudu box you bought? Pulling in
Transformers in HD uses your cable provider's pipes, but
your cable provider doesn't see a dime from the transaction.
Suppose
you decide to opt for an all-digital approach from Vudu
or Apple TV, and you have a moderate habit of two movies
a week. A 90-minute HD movie running at a constant bitrate
of 2.5 megabits per second will swallow 1.69 GB. If you've
got a 40GB cap, eight movies will eat over a quarter of
it. And that's just your rental habit, with today's specs.
The 1080p flicks they'll be streaming tomorrow will be
even more bandwidth intensive.
Data
caps will not destroy the internet, but internet
VOD or "internet movie streaming"
is what's actually facing the greatest threat. Time Warner
has openly said content providers can't have it both ways.
It would effectively have us paying twice for video delivered
over the internet. Most people can barely stand paying
for it once.
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(08/01/2008)
FCC
to Rule Against Comcast on P2P Blockage.
It comes as no surprise, but the FCC has officially ruled
on the issue of Comcast P2P blocking and determined in
a 3-2 vote that the company must stop blocking web access
and fully disclose its traffic management practices to
subscribers—but it will not be fined for its actions.
It is only a small victory though—as we have already stated,
this ruling does not prevent data caps from being implemented
by ISPs and there is no guarantee that the ruling will
hold up in court. Chances are the FCC does not legally
have the authority to regulate ISPs in the first place.
|
|
Technology:
(07/25/08)
Is physical media is at risk?
I think it's
funny how so many people seem to assume that internet
VOD or "internet movie streaming" is going to
replace physical media. There are so many barriers against
it, that I honestly can't see it growing much beyond maybe
10% of the home video market, at least in the next ten
years. We're not talking 3 MB song downloads, here, but
multi-gigabyte movie downloads for good quality HD. Certainly
it will have its place, but replacing physical media?
No way. No one is going to come wave a magic wand and
give every household in the world unlimited bandwidth
and unlimited data transfer, but any household in the
world can go out and buy a DVD or Blu-ray player right
now and get as much of whatever content they want.
This
reminds me of the dot com days in 1999, when everyone
thought that a viable business model was irrelevant. I
suppose they think Grandma and Grandpa are going to wire
their home theater for Ethernet, run out and buy a proprietary
video streaming solution, and cash is just going to rain
from the sky for these providers, right?
|
|
Technology:
(06/20/2008)
Is the Internet meter running? Maybe
The days of "all you can eat" Internet access may be numbered.
Time
Warner Cable Inc. acknowledged earlier this week that
it's testing a plan to charge its heaviest Internet users
extra monthly fees if they break a so-called bandwidth
cap. Other cable operators also are looking at such an
approach, and even their rivals in the phone industry
seem open to the idea.
That's
bad news for a fraction of customers who frequently download
or upload large files, such as movies or music collections.
The good news? Most consumers won't notice any difference
in their bills once the era of unlimited flat-rate Internet
access is over.
"It
would not affect 95% of the people," said Bruce Leichtman,
who runs Leichtman Research Group, focusing on broadband
service.Consider the sort of approach Time Warner is testing
in Texas. The company would offer a basic $30 a month
plan with a 5-gigabyte cap and a faster $55 a month service
with a 40-gigabyte limit. Customers would pay a dollar
for every extra gigabyte they use.
Sounds
scary, all right. No one wants to get socked with suddenly
high access bills. Yet very few consumers come close to
Time Warner's proposed caps, or have any idea how much
bandwidth they use. One
gigabyte, for example, is the equivalent of 1,000 novels,
3,000 Web page views or 17 hours of MP3 music, to cite
some examples. Most
activities on the Web, in fact, take up surprisingly little
bandwidth. Even online gaming (hard-core players, listen
up) is a modest devourer of network resources. The biggest
culprit by far is video, and to a lesser extent, audio
files. Unless
customers frequently download movies, they would probably
never exceed such caps. Given the increasing availability
of video-on-demand services, TiVo-like devices and old-fashioned
movie channels such as HBO, there's little reason for
most people to use the Internet as their chief video-delivery
option. So
why tinker at all with current flat-rate plans at the
risk of confusing consumers and potentially causing some
to cancel service or tie up costly help lines? In
the case of cable companies, it's not about squeezing
more money from subscribers. Cable operators are trying
to manage the precious and dwindling capacity on their
networks to maintain a high quality of service.
For most cable operators, about 5% of all their customers
account for half of total bandwidth usage. If left unchecked,
the situation could reach a point where slowdowns or disruptions
affect every cable-modem customer. It's only fair, executives
say, that heavy users bear the costs of bandwidth-hogging.
There's also the delicate question of what those heavy
users are doing. Industry executives won't say it, but
Leichtman suspects most heavy users engage in illegal
or questionable behavior, trafficking in copyrighted music
or videos.
See
Reoprt on BusinessWeek June 4, 2008
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(06/10/2008) Netflix to hike Blu-ray rental price
Get
ready to pay a "modest monthly premium" if you want to
rent Blu-ray movies from the by-mail DVD giant. Netflix
will begin charging a premium to subscribers who rent
Blu-ray Discs sometime this year, CEO Reed Hastings said
during the company’s first-quarter earnings conference
call today. Hastings said the increase would be modest
and blamed it on the higher wholesale prices on Blu-ray
compared to DVD. The company expects the percentage of
subscribers who rent Blu-ray to stay in the single digits
this year, he said. The talk of raising prices came as
Netflix reported record first-quarter subscriber growth
due to competitor Blockbuster’s price hike late last year.
My
2 cents: This
is a step on the wrong direction for the blu-ray technology.
This is the time that companies should maintain blu-ray
prices as an incentive to the new technology.
|
Technology:
(06/01/2008)
Roku's Netflix Player: Cheap Set-Top Box but Not Much Worth
Watching
The
$100 Netflix Player by Roku is a great little device for
watching streamed content on your TV. It's easy to use,
the viewing quality is decent, and did I mention it's cheap?
Add to that the availability of 10,000 DVD titles for Netflix
customers to choose from at no extra cost, and, well, there's
the rub. Those 10,000 titles are pretty much the bottom
of the Netflix content barrel. |
|
News
and Rumors:
(05/25/2008) Flexplay disposable DVD are making a comeback.
Staples
will begin selling disposable discs from Atlanta-based
Flexplay Technologies in its 2,000 stores across the country
beginning in mid-June. Flexplay has deals with Warner
Home Video, New Line Home Entertainment, Paramount Home
Entertainment and DreamWorks to sell new release movies
on its disposable discs, according to its Web site. Flexplay
time-limited discs play for 48 hours after they’ve been
removed from their sealed packages, essentially making
them disposable rental discs. Discs will be priced between
$4 to $6.
Disney
sold movies on the disposable discs, dubbed EZ-D, in 7-Eleven
stores and through pizza chain Papa John’s in select cities
for a year before giving up on the concept. This time,
Flexplay has lowered the price of the discs so that they
are more in line with rentals. Flexplay also is promoting
recycling of the discs on its Web site and will allow
buyers to print out a prepaid mailer to return the discs
to Flexplay for recycling.
By
Video Business Online 2008
My
2 cents: It won''t last 6 months. Another chance for Paramount
and Dreamworks to pick-up free money from a foolish manufacturer
like they did with HD-DVD.
|
|
Technology:
(03/26/2008) $100 HDMI Cables? Don't Be Fooled
If you've ever been shopping for an HDTV at a big electronics
retail store, you'll know the drill-basically, once the
pushy salespeople hit you up for the $500 extended warranty,
they steer you toward the $100 (or more) HDMI, digital
audio and coaxial cables. Usually, these cables come in
fancy packaging, the connectors are dipped in gold (literally),
and you're told that if you're buying a $3,000 TV, you
might as well throw down a couple hundred more for the
very best cables. Don't fall for it.
While
the top-dollar cables at the electronics store sure looks
amazing, you really, honestly don't need them. Bargain
HDMI, optical and coaxial cables will deliver excellent
images and sound without the solid-gold connectors or
snazzy plastic casings. I've been using a $20 HDMI cable,
$5 coaxial cables and $10 optical cables for a few years
now, and no one's complained yet.
Don't
take my word for it, though. The experts at Ars Technica
would be the first ones to tell you that a $100 Monster-brand
HDMI cable delivers a better picture than, say, a $15
off-brand version. Their verdict? "Cabling is something
of a racket, and while there probably is a difference
between the medium-quality cables and the Monster Cables
that cost $100+, I'm guessing none of us have systems
that will let us tell enough of a difference to make the
price worth it."
I
couldn't agree more. I recommend you pay no more than
about $20 for an HDMI cable, $10-15 for an optical (or
Toslink) digital audio cable, $10 for a component-video
cable, and $10 or less for regular RCA-type cables. The
sales dude may look appalled, but do yourself a favor
and save your money.
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(11/02/2007) Just How Many Subscribers Are Leaving
Netflix?
Bloomberg's Jonathan Weil digs deeper
into Netflix's churn numbers and finds that the company
is losing more than half of its subscribers each year.
Though, with the exception of the latest quarter, the
retailer has generally added more new subscribers than
it loses, allowing it to grow its subscriber base each
quarter.
Weil
notes that Netflix defines churn differently than most
other companies including TiVo. That lowers the churn
rate the online DVD retailer reports. By Netflix's estimation,
churn in the latest quarter was 4.6%. By Weil's estimate,
using the definition TiVo and others use, the retailer's
churn was 16%. More surprising/disturbing was that Weil
found that for the full year ending June 30, churn was
63%, meaning that the retailer lost two-thirds of its
customers during the year.
Bloomberg
sees the churn as a possible sign of trouble to come for
the retailer: If it got to 6.8 million subscribers, assuming
the 63 percent annual churn holds steady, Netflix would
have about 4.16 million cancellations this year. That
means it will need to have added 4.64 million new subscribers
on a gross basis come Dec. 31. That's a whopping 73 percent
as many subscribers as Netflix had at the start of 2007.
by
Jennifer
Netherby on November 2, 2007 - Video Business Online
|
|
Technology:
(10/28/2007) Required
Cables and Connectors for Your HDTV
Some cable/connection types are (almost
always) simply better than others - they give you a better
picture or clearer audio. So how do you know which cable
you want for what connection?
HDMI:
Short for "High-Definition Multimedia Interface,"
HDMI is the latest thing in home-theater interfaces. You'll
recognize HDMI inputs by their thin, flat shape, and most
HDTV sets sold today have at least one HDMI input (if
not two or more). One of the advantages of HDMI is that
it allows for an all-digital connection, meaning that
the digital signals from your DVD, Blu-ray or HD DVD player
don't need to be converted to analog (a process that will
degrade the resulting picture, if ever so slightly). HDMI
connections will also deliver both audio and digital signals,
and the latest version of HDMI (1.3) supports Dolby TrueHD
and DTS-HD Master Audio, a pair of "lossless" audio formats
that you'll find on Blu-ray and HD DVD discs. Oh, and
one more thing: HDMI also supports DRM, a little feature
that's much loved by the movie industry and despised by
home-theater advocates, who note that once HDMI-based
copy-protection schemes are fully implemented (which won't
happen for a few years, at least), they may lead to nightmarish
compatibility problems.
DVI:
The Digital Visual Interface, or DVI, is primarily used
for computer displays and digital projectors, although
you'll find DVI-D (the extra D stands for "digital") inputs
on some older HDTVs. Unlike HDMI connections, DVI only
delivers video. If you happen to have an older HD set
with a DVI input, you can still try connecting it to an
HDMI device using a DVI-to-HDMI cable.
Component
video: An analog connection as opposed to the digital
HDMI and DVI interfaces, component video is perfectly
capable of delivering high-def signals to your HDTV—my
Xbox 360, for example, sends gorgeous 1080p video to my
TV over component video. However, many manufacturers don't
let their DVD, Blu-ray and HD DVD players send 1080p images
over component, probably because component video doesn't
support DRM copy protection. And while robotic TV salesmen
will repeat endlessly that HDMI connections are the best,
I urge you to take the Pepsi challenge with HDMI versus
component—you may be able to tell the difference on a
massive 70-inch display, but otherwise, good luck. Anyway,
a component video cable is actually a bundle of three
cables that separates the video signal into three distinct
components: the "Y" cable handles luminescence (or brightness),
while the "Pb" and "Pr" cables divide up the color signals.
If your HDTV has a component-video input (and I can virtually
guarantee you that it does), you'll find a trio of RCA-type
plugs marked "Y", "Pb" and "Pr"; when you connect the
component-video cable, make sure you match those three
plugs correctly, or else you'll get a black-and-white
picture or no image at all.
S-Video:
A step down from component video, S-Video (or "separate
video") carries video signals (but no audio) to TVs using
two distinct signals, compared to three for component
video. S-Video connections came into vogue with the development
of high-end VHS players, and while they do a decent job
with standard-definition images, they're incompatible
with HD. If you're connecting a DVD player to a 19- or
24-inch CRT TV, S-Video will probably do the trick, but
if you're watching on a screen that's 32 inches or bigger,
you should use the component-video inputs if you can.
S-Video cables have little round plugs at the end with
thin, oh-so-delicate pins inside; be careful when plugging
the cable (it can be maddeningly difficult to do), lest
you damage the pins and render the cable unusable.
Composite
video: Even lower quality than S-Video, composite
video cables send images to your TV using just one signal,
so the picture will be less than pristine, although the
single RCA-type plug couldn’t be easier to attach. While
most big-screen HDTVs have composite video inputs, you
better not let me catch you using it (unless you're just
plugging in your vintage GameCube or something).
Coaxial
RF: These round, threaded inputs aren't straight-ahead
video connectors per se; rather, they let you plug over-the-air
antennas and cables to your TV, and coupled with an analog
or digital tuner, they deliver anything from old-style
VHF and UHF broadcast TV channels to full-on HDTV signals.
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(10/22/2007)
SONY - The next Evil Empire ?
What's up with Sony? (Betamax, MiniDisc, SACD and now…)
In July 2000, a marketing executive working
for Sony Corporation created a fictitious film critic,
David Manning, who gave consistently good reviews for
releases from Sony subsidiary Columbia Pictures, which
generally received poor reviews amongst real critics.
In
Nov, 2005 Sony BMG installed Trojan horse software on
users' computers, then claimed it wasn't a problem, then
released a "removal" tool that was actually spy ware…
Sony, like most music companies, wants complete control
over how you use the music and movie you buy. They want
to prevent you from copying it, even to an iPod or a mix
you take in your car. So this time Sony took it to the
max. It hired a company called First4Internet to design
a copy-protection system called XCP. If you tried to play
a protected disk in your computer, you first had to agree
to install a Sony music player to listen to it. But what
Sony didn't say out loud was that the software also included
a rootkit. Both Sony and First4Internet did such a lousy
job that the hidden space created by the rootkit could
be used by anyone who knew about it. In other words, it
created a huge security hole - a space on every user's
computer that a virus writer could hide some nasty code.
Sony's excuse? In an NPR interview, Thomas Hesse, president
of Sony BMG's global digital business said, "Most people
I think don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should
they care about it?"
In
April, 2007 Sony says it has discovered a glitch on recent
DVD releases including Casino Royale, The Pursuit of Happiness
and Stranger Than Fiction that prevented the movies from
playing on some DVD players. Sony said the problem was
due to an update of its ARccOS copy-protection system,
an additional layer of protection meant to prevent ripping.
The studio has included ARccOS on its DVDs for the past
two years. The copy-protection is continually updated
to keep ahead of hackers. Several thousand users complained
directly to Sony and on discussion boards at Amazon.com
and other blogs, saying their players were freezing or
shutting off in the menu section of recent releases from
the studio. ARccOS is known to have compatibility problems
with some models of Sony, PS2, Toshiba and Harman Kardon
DVD players.
|
|
News
and Rumors:
(10/01/2007)'Bandwidth
hogs' finding the Internet has its limits
Comcast advertises unlimited service, yet kicks people
off if they "use too much". Once again, Comcast seems
to be starting to cut off internet service to "customers
with excessive Internet use and movies download." This
is an old story that receded from public view a couple
of years ago after Comcast previously received much negative
PR over the issue. The company has been heavily criticized
for misleading advertising of "unlimited" Internet service,
while issuing vague charges of excessive bandwidth use
when some customers are sent disconnection notices by
the Comcast Abuse Department. Comcast has never accurately
defined "unlimited" or "excessive" in terms of service
agreements, although the term "unlimited" seems self-evident
to most average citizens.
Several
other media outlets have picked up this story and one
former Comcast customer has started a blog on the issue.
I believe that this is just the first step in Cable TV's
scheme to invalidate net neutrality and head off competing
IPTV movie and HDTV download services that soon will be
offered by Apple Computer (and already offered by other,
lesser known startups companies).
|
Back
|